基于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估和成本分析的變壓器維修策略研究
周博
(國網(wǎng)湖北省電力有限公司隨州供電公司,湖北 隨州 441300)
摘 要:針對電力變壓器檢修管理中,單一的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)模型和成本模型不能同時(shí)考慮到安全性與經(jīng)濟(jì)性要求,提出一種基于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估和成本分析的維修策略。以風(fēng)險(xiǎn)理論為基礎(chǔ),結(jié)合設(shè)備故障概率和故障可能導(dǎo)致的資產(chǎn)及系統(tǒng)損失,評(píng)估變壓器運(yùn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)值;針對風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估結(jié)果,通過引入ALARP 準(zhǔn)則劃分風(fēng)險(xiǎn)可接受等級(jí),判斷是否需要檢修工作。對于經(jīng)濟(jì)性指標(biāo),利用全壽命成本理論對變壓器壽命周期內(nèi)各成本要素進(jìn)行劃分、量化計(jì)算,再以最小年金成本為判據(jù)確定設(shè)備現(xiàn)齡是否在其最佳壽命周期內(nèi),并在綜合考慮電力變壓器的運(yùn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與當(dāng)前役齡的基礎(chǔ)上,制定出兼具安全性與經(jīng)濟(jì)性的維修策略。實(shí)際案例表明,此維修策略可行。
關(guān)鍵詞:變壓器;維修策略;風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估;全壽命周期成本;ALARP 準(zhǔn)則
中圖分類號(hào):TM407 文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼:A 文章編號(hào):1007-3175(2019)05-0012-05
Research on Transformer Maintenance Strategy Based on Risk Assessment and Cost Analysis
ZHOU Bo
(Suizhou Electric Company of State Grid Hubei Electric Power Co., Ltd, Suizhou 441300, China)
Abstract: In the maintenance management of power transformers, considering that a single risk or cost model can’t take into account the safety and economic requirements, this paper proposed a maintenance strategy based on risk assessment and cost analysis. Based on the risk theory, the operational risk value of transformer was evaluated according to the equipment failure probability and the possible loss of assets and system. In allusion to the results of risk assessment, the ALARP criterion was adopted to classify the acceptable level of risk to determine whether the maintenance work was needed. For economic indicators, this paper divided and quantified those cost elements in the life cycle of transformer through life cycle cost theory, and the minimum cost was used as the criterion to judge whether the current service age of transformer was at its best in the life cycle. On the basis of comprehensively considering the operation risk of power transformer and its current service age, this paper worked out the maintenance strategy with both security and economy. The actual case shows the feasible of this maintenance strategy.
Key words: transformer; maintenance strategy; risk assessment; life cycle cost; ALARP criterion
參考文獻(xiàn)
[1] 王建,朱文兵,辜超,等. 基于健康指數(shù)的電力變壓器狀態(tài)評(píng)估[J]. 高壓電器,2018,54(5):248-253.
[2] 田雨,張晗. 基于故障特征隸屬函數(shù)的電網(wǎng)主設(shè)備風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估方案研究與應(yīng)用[J]. 高壓電器,2017,53(5):146-153.
[3] 張鐿議,廖瑞金,楊麗君,等. 綜合考慮可靠性與經(jīng)濟(jì)性的電力變壓器檢修方案優(yōu)選[J]. 電工技術(shù)學(xué)報(bào),2014,29(11):191-195.
[4] 王茜. 基于輸變電設(shè)備風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估的維修決策[J].計(jì)算機(jī)與數(shù)字工程,2014,42(11):2099-2101.
[5] 何樂彰,張忠會(huì),姚峰. 基于設(shè)備運(yùn)行風(fēng)險(xiǎn)等級(jí)的檢修策略研究[J]. 水電能源科學(xué),2014,32(4):206-207.
[6] 潘樂真,張焰,俞國勤,等. 狀態(tài)檢修決策中的電氣設(shè)備故障率推算[J]. 電力自動(dòng)化設(shè)備,2010,30(2):91-94.
[7] 國家電網(wǎng)公司. 輸變電設(shè)備風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估導(dǎo)則:Q/GDW 1903—2013[S]. 北京:中國電力出版社,2013:3-8.
[8] 丁厚成,萬成略. 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)值初探[J]. 工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保,2004,30(10):45-47.
[9] 羅云. 風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析與安全評(píng)價(jià)[M].2 版. 北京:化學(xué)工業(yè)出版社,2010.
[10] 柳璐,王和杰,程浩忠,等. 基于全壽命周期成本的電力系統(tǒng)經(jīng)濟(jì)性評(píng)估方法[J]. 電力系統(tǒng)自動(dòng)化,2012,36(15):46-47.
[11] 崔新奇,尹來賓,范春菊,等. 變電站改造中變壓器全生命周期費(fèi)用LCC模型的研究[J]. 電力系統(tǒng)保護(hù)與控制,2010,38(7):70-72.
[12] 徐玉琴,任正,詹翔靈,等. 電力變壓器全壽命周期成本建模及其綜合敏感性分析[J]. 華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),2014,41(6):81-85.
[13] 吳國威,周輝,潘巍巍,等. 基于全壽命周期的變壓器成本風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估[J]. 華東電力,2013,41(3):532-534.
[14] 孫鵬,陳紹輝,張彩慶. 基于全壽命周期成本模型的變電站設(shè)備最佳壽命周期評(píng)估[J]. 南方電網(wǎng)技術(shù),2011,5(6):96-100.
[15] 張鐿議. 基于運(yùn)行狀態(tài)和壽命評(píng)估的電力變壓器全壽命周期檢修決策研究[D]. 重慶:重慶大學(xué),2014:89-93.